I and others still would enjoy seeing where this is all going! My position has always been, Power it how ya want!, just don't be surprised when/if you find your brand X engine and trans(in spite of copious effort) produces insufficient gain vs modification expense!
.....Contrary to popular(web troll) belief I did not wake up one morning and decide to mid engine a Cobalt. The big pic was mid engine Some BODY that had been built FWD..... The search began, it had to have a front sub frame supporting the drive train.(there goes most import options) There had to be so many made so that I start with an inexpensive, highly interchangeable and available victim!(Goodbye 98 Dodge Avenger, so many pretty victims lost due to high cost/low availability) You can see where this is headed(Goodbye 2000 Celica). The final straw was the creation of the DF Goblin! They did so much of my Science Homework how could I turn that GIFT away! My goal was also to produce a unit that would still be road legal even emissions compliant if needed. So let us see where you're headed!.....
A word of advice, don't give nay sayers much attention, unless they have already tried to build the exact same toy! Then at least see if they will admit where they went wrong! Plus Cubic Dollars will overcome much, so if'n ya got the bux it's all possible. (I'm determined to be on the no $$ list.)
Warning! History Vomit: In the early days of the Ford Mustang 64-8 there was a push to a 2 seat/mid engine design. I would have liked to have seen that! The corporation said No Two Seaters, must have higher sales volume. And some portion of Ford backdoored the DeTomaso, Pantera W/ 351CID Cleveland motor into Lincoln/Mercury dealerships by 72. IMO The 2 seat car remained the toy of the rich fellows.