Id try spraying carb cleaner (or similar) around the engine to see if the idle rises, use the straw to be a little more accurate of where you're spraying to narrow down the potential leak if you get a change in idle. Id start around the intake.Update:
So the shop it is at now had some time to log it this morning, and they are saying that it sounds like there may be an air leak somewhere. I am not really sure where it would be. I checked all of the vacuum ports. They are all good. It could really only be at the supercharger gasket or somewhere on the intake manifold. That would be strange though, it runs well off idle. I suppose we will see!
I actually did that, and didn’t notice anything. Then again, the engine was already surging in RPM so it may be hard to notice any change in RPM. Lol.Id try spraying carb cleaner (or similar) around the engine to see if the idle rises, use the straw to be a little more accurate of where you're spraying to narrow down the potential leak if you get a change in idle. Id start around the intake.
Good idea.Got a fog machine...
Used these a few times at work looking for leaks.
REGIN Smoke Emitter, 90 sec. Time, 600 Volume (Cu.-Ft.), PK 10 - 3KLK2|S103 - Grainger
Looking for REGIN Smoke Emitter, 90 sec. Time, 600 Volume (Cu.-Ft.), PK 10 (3KLK2)? Grainger's got your back. Price $19.10. Easy online ordering and next-day delivery available with 24/7 expert product support.m.grainger.com
NC, no changes with the MAF unplugged.Unplug the MAF sensor see if it changes. This sounds similar to the MAF not being plugged in for my SS/SC.
If you are asking if you could have the lines on fuel filter backwards from the fuel pump, I'm not sure how you could because they are two different sizes and will not interchange unless you cut the lines and put on new fittings and got those mixed up. Even if you did, I don't think it will cause an issue because my understanding is that fuel goes in the large port and anything that is not used by the engine will freely flow out the smaller port and return to the tank. The pressure regulator is in the pump on the return line not in the fuel filter.Update:
I swapped out the intake manifold and supercharger gaskets today, still exact same issue. The local shop who looked at it said the STFT’s at idle were wonky, making them think it was a leak in the intake somewhere. I think I have ran down all possible locations that there could be a leak. The only one that I didn’t replace was the fuel injector insulator cup things between the injectors and the heads, but I inspected those today and they seem just fine. All still in place snug, so I assume the o-rings on them are still intact.
I did have one question...on the fuel pump hat we have a send a return line that goes to the fuel filter. If I had those backwards, could this be a possible issue?? I assume I would have a car that didn’t run at all, but I am not exactly sure how the return works within the filter. I don’t think I have intermittent fuel pressure issues, but I don’t think there is any way to tell.
Any other suggestions guys?? I now have an MPVi2 so I can log stuff and tweak my tune if I decide to go that route.
I will take a look at that, thanks! At this point I am nearly positive it’s in the tune. My tuner at Intense is willing to work on it too. I’ll just have to send the tune back and forth a few times before we get it I’m sure.In HP tuners look at idle then airflow; ETC area Scalar mine is currently set at 2,950.0000. This was the change that made the most difference in idle surge. To change the mixture at idle and lower RPM you will adjust MAF airflow vs Output Frequency.
Brad
816-605-3833 till 9pm central time
I did cut the lines and now have HP fuel hose on there. So I could have swapped them. Pretty sure I didn’t, but thinking of everything.If you are asking if you could have the lines on fuel filter backwards from the fuel pump, I'm not sure how you could because they are two different sizes and will not interchange unless you cut the lines and put on new fittings and got those mixed up. Even if you did, I don't think it will cause an issue because my understanding is that fuel goes in the large port and anything that is not used by the engine will freely flow out the smaller port and return to the tank. The pressure regulator is in the pump on the return line not in the fuel filter.
Read your file and send it to me (read the entire contents and make sure to save it as a backup on your computer). I would just like to take a look at it. Maybe try a stock SS/SC tune just to see if that helps to rule out the tune.
I will PM you my email.
Here is what my tuner said could possibly fix it:In HP tuners look at idle then airflow; ETC area Scalar mine is currently set at 2,950.0000. This was the change that made the most difference in idle surge. To change the mixture at idle and lower RPM you will adjust MAF airflow vs Output Frequency.
Brad
816-605-3833 till 9pm central time
My idle airflow ETC Area Scalar is set to 2,950.0000.In HP tuners look at idle then airflow; ETC area Scalar mine is currently set at 2,950.0000. This was the change that made the most difference in idle surge. To change the mixture at idle and lower RPM you will adjust MAF airflow vs Output Frequency.
Brad
816-605-3833 till 9pm central time
You da man. I’ll compare the settings and see what is already in tune.I will send my air mass meter settings in the morning.
Brad
In looking at your tune file, I cannot for the life of me figure out what they heck they are doing here. This is the flow rate of the injectors. Typically this is mostly linear. I guess this is the "odd dip" he mentions that GM programmed in. I've never seen that before in any tune nor stock tune.
View attachment 8926
For reference, this is a GM Stage 2 tune:
View attachment 8927
Before I would go much farther, I would either put a stock tune back on for testing or smooth out that dip like he said.
They did not change the torque management. That just makes it hard to drive. Odd, there are some setting changes that are identical, down the the exact same value as mine from ZZP. Really weird settings. Check out this weird graph. This is Injector Offset vs. Battery Voltage vs. MAP, basically changing the injectors depending on the actual battery voltage. Under normal conditions, much of this would never be used (8V or 18V). But look at the weird split in the middle of the chart and then the big spike at 8V, what the heck is the purpose of that? Again, my ZZP tune has this exact same setting but none of the GM tunes do.
View attachment 8928
Wow! That is super weird. I will have to throw a stock tune on and see what it does.In looking at your tune file, I cannot for the life of me figure out what they heck they are doing here. This is the flow rate of the injectors. Typically this is mostly linear. I guess this is the "odd dip" he mentions that GM programmed in. I've never seen that before in any tune nor stock tune.
View attachment 8926
For reference, this is a GM Stage 2 tune:
View attachment 8927
Before I would go much farther, I would either put a stock tune back on for testing or smooth out that dip like he said.
They did not change the torque management. That just makes it hard to drive. Odd, there are some setting changes that are identical, down the the exact same value as mine from ZZP. Really weird settings. Check out this weird graph. This is Injector Offset vs. Battery Voltage vs. MAP, basically changing the injectors depending on the actual battery voltage. Under normal conditions, much of this would never be used (8V or 18V). But look at the weird split in the middle of the chart and then the big spike at 8V, what the heck is the purpose of that? Again, my ZZP tune has this exact same setting but none of the GM tunes do.
View attachment 8928